s s
Daily News Blog


  • Archives

  • Categories

    • Agriculture (428)
    • Announcements (288)
    • Antibacterial (103)
    • Aquaculture (13)
    • Biofuels (5)
    • Biological Control (1)
    • Biomonitoring (14)
    • Cannabis (4)
    • Children/Schools (184)
    • Climate Change (23)
    • Environmental Justice (69)
    • Events (60)
    • Farmworkers (76)
    • Fracking (1)
    • Golf (10)
    • Health care (25)
    • Holidays (24)
    • Integrated and Organic Pest Management (31)
    • International (225)
    • Invasive Species (23)
    • Label Claims (32)
    • Lawns/Landscapes (149)
    • Litigation (209)
    • Nanotechnology (51)
    • National Politics (265)
    • Pesticide Drift (66)
    • Pesticide Regulation (492)
    • Pesticide Residues (22)
    • Pets (14)
    • Resistance (48)
    • Rodenticide (16)
    • Take Action (259)
    • Uncategorized (10)
    • Wildlife/Endangered Sp. (240)
    • Wood Preservatives (20)


California Report Finds Children Need Protection from Agricultural Pesticide Drift

(Beyond Pesticides, April 6, 2010) A new report analyzing regulations from California’s 25 top agricultural counties finds that many counties do more to protect crops than children from potentially harmful pesticide drift. The report, Pesticide Protection Zones: Keeping Kids Safe at School, finds that eleven counties have no protection zones around schools at all, while another six only limit spraying when school is in session. By contrast, the report notes that nearly 25% of the counties have larger pesticide buffer zones for crops than for schools.

“It seems insane to have stringent rules protecting nuts and peaches while schoolchildren remain at risk from chemicals that can cause cancer, birth defects, and other serious health problems,” said Paul Towers, director of Pesticide Watch Education Fund and a co-author of the report. “But that’s exactly what’s happening in counties across California. It is past time for a simple, statewide rule that protects all California children from pesticide drift at school.”

“Our children deserve to be protected from these cancer-causing chemicals,” said
Assembly member Sandré Swanson, who has introduced AB 1721, the Health and Safety School Zones Act, to fix the problem. “The people of California have made it clear that clean air is a right and not a privilege. Many communities have recognized the unintended side-effects of aerial spraying and have passed rules to protect their school sites,” said Assembly member Swanson. “I will work cooperatively with the Legislature to pass this common sense approach to protect our children.”

HB 1721 establishes a statewide rule prohibiting pesticide spraying within a quarter mile of any California school and prohibiting restricted-use pesticide spraying within a half-mile of a school.

California provides for only a patchwork of inconsistent and inadequate county rules. In six counties, school protection zones apply only when children are present, even though many pesticides persist in the environment and can pose health threats long after spraying. By contrast, rules prohibiting pesticide spraying to protect the state’s agricultural sector are detailed and stringent.

For example, the report found that:
• In Colusa County, areas around schools are less protected than those around many crops, including walnuts, peaches, rice and others. Regulations state that when “sensitive crops” are more than one mile away and are downwind, “extreme caution must be used under all conditions” [emphasis in the original];
• In Kern County, spraying of certain pesticides is restricted within one quarter mile of schools only when children are present, but to protect bees, spraying of three insecticides is prohibited within one mile of almond orchards;
• In Tulare County, spraying of certain pesticides is restricted within one quarter mile of schools only when school is in session, but spraying of three insecticides is prohibited within one mile of any pollinating fields, even when weeds are the only pollinating plants; and,
• In Sutter County, spraying of certain pesticides is restricted within one quarter mile of schools is prohibited when school is in session, but spraying of one herbicide is prohibited four miles around prunes.

In California, 90% of pesticides used are prone to “pesticide drift,” the movement of pesticides away from the application site. Almost 20% of the pesticides used in California are known to cause cancer, almost 10% are known to damage the nervous system, and more than 10% are known to harm the reproductive system. Children are especially vulnerable to the adverse effects of pesticide exposure because of their rapidly growing bodies.

While it is illegal to expose people to drifting pesticides, the California Department of Pesticide
Regulation admits that “some off-site movement occurs with every [pesticide] application” and “drift into surrounding areas is expected with all pesticide applications.” A 2005 study by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) found more than 250 incidents of pesticide exposure to children occurred in California schools between 1998-2002, with 50 of the incidents resulting from nearby agricultural pesticide use. NIOSH recommends establishing and enforcing pesticide spray buffer zones around schools to protect children.

A 2008 study by Pesticide Action Network North America confirms that school children continue to breathe air contaminated by hazardous agricultural pesticides. Air monitoring near South Woods Elementary School in Hastings, Florida detected four agricultural chemicals in the air, often at levels that pose unacceptable risks to children.

According to Beyond Pesticides’ report The Schooling of State Pesticide Laws – 2010 Update, only nine states (Alabama, Arizona, California, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and New Jersey) have some sort of a restriction on pesticide applications made near school properties, ranging from 300 feet to two and a half miles, depending on the application method, pesticide type and site to be protected from potential drift. In order to adequately protect against drift, Beyond Pesticides recommends a minimum two-mile radius around the school’s property for ground applications and a minimum three mile radius for aerial applications. California’s existing law states that when a school property is within 300 feet of a methyl bromide application, the application must be completed no less than 36 hours prior to the start of the school day. (California Code of Regulations, Title 3, Division 6, Chapter 2, Subchapter 4, Article 4, Section 6447.2(i)).

The report, Pesticide Protection Zones: Keeping Kids Safe at School, was co-released by Pesticide Watch Education Fund, The Center for Environmental Health, and published by Californians for Pesticide Reform, a statewide coalition of over 185 groups working to protect public health and the environment from the dangers of pesticide use.

For more information on how pesticides impact children’s health and strategies for getting pesticides out of the school environment, see Beyond Pesticides’ Children and Schools webpage.


One Response to “California Report Finds Children Need Protection from Agricultural Pesticide Drift”

  1. 1
    BettyK Says:

    What is equally insane is that we have to resort to using children as a reason for not using pesticides. Pesticides are harmful to everyone ~ not just children.

    I recently applied for low-income senior housing. I have been disabled by chemical illness for more than 20 years and yet they argued that this HUD housing facility must – on a monthly basis – spray pesticides around the complex because people don’t like bees, spiders, ants, etc. Pesticides cause me to lose motor function, become very nauseous, and lose cognitive abilities, but because people “don’t like” these little pests that are ecologically relevant that we all must suffer the use of pesticides. Simply speaking, the world has gone nuts!

Leave a Reply

+ five = 7