|
Alerts
Latest
News
Media
Publications
Lawsuit
Resources
Program
Page
Home
|
|
Poison
Poles A Report About Their Toxic Trail and Safer Alternatives
The
Toxic Trail
Chemical Treatment
of Wood
Amount
of Treated Wood Produced by Type of Preservative
| Creosote
Solutions21 |
91,751,000
cubic feet (15.9%) |
| Oilborne
Solutions22 |
32,764,000
cubic feet (5.7%) |
Inorganic
arsenicals/
Waterborne Solutions23 |
450,596,000
cubic feet (77.8%) |
| Fire
Retardants |
3,763,000
cubic feet (0.6%) |
| Total |
578,874,000
cubic feet |
According to the
American Wood Preservers Institute (AWPI), wood treatment "extends
the service life of wood products by decades."15 Sixty-nine percent
of the wood treatment industry principally uses Southern Yellow Pine,
although in the northwest both Douglas fir and Western Red Cedar are
used.16 As AWPI acknowledges, the wood used is "subject to attack
by insects, microorganisms and fungi."17 Wood preservatives protect
against fungi, insects, bacteria and marine organisms.18 Most of the
naturally resistant woods are considered too expensive to produce
and when they are used, as is the case of Western Red Cedar in the
northwest, they are always chemically-treated at the submerged base
portion and often full length treated.
In 1995, the
wood preserving industry reported $3.65 billion in annual gross
sales. In the same year, total volume of treated wood produced reached
578,874,000 cubic feet.19
The largest
use of pentachlorophenol and other
oilborne solutions is in the treatment of utility poles. Of the
32,764,000 cubic feet of all wood treated with penta and oilborne
solutions, 93 percent, or 30,617,000 cubic feet, is used in
How
many poles are treated with which chemicals?
| Chem. |
Treated
Wood (1,000 feet3) |
Percent |
| Penta/Oil |
30,617 |
45 |
| Arsenicals |
29,215 |
42 |
| Creosote |
8,941 |
13 |
| TOTAL |
68,773 |
100 |
| source:
American Wood Preservers Institute, 1995 |
the production
of utility poles. Of the 450,596,000 cubic feet of all wood treated
with arsenicals, six percent, or 29,215,000 cubic feet, go into
utility poles. In other words, the vast majority of pentachlorophenol
is used on utility poles.20 Nevertheless, the treatment of utility
poles are almost evenly split between penta and CCA, with 45 percent
treated with penta, 42 percent with CCA and 13 percent with creosote.
More Info:
Wood Preserving Facilities and Contaminated
Sites by State |
|
"The
Environmental Protection Agency plans to spend $18 million
relocating people from 158 houses and 200 apartment in Pensacola,
FL." The homes are neighbors with the Escambia Treating Company,
where "the logs, telephone poles in the making, were dripping
chemical preservatives, first creosote, then pentachlorophenol.
In 1991, long after the company went bankrupt emergency team
from the EPA dug up the toxic mess, piled it into a 60-foot
high mound laced with dioxin and other chemicals, and stored
it tight under a polyethylene cover. Mr. Kaufman, EPA engineer,
suggested that 'common sense' justified the relocation. 'Very
few people are going to keel over and die because of a Superfund
site,' he said. 'It's the long term health risks that are
the problem.'"
The
New York Times, October 21, 1996.
|
Treatment process
Poles must be prepared
before the chemical is applied. The preparation may include peeling,
drying, conditioning, incising, cutting, and framing. These processes
enable the preservative to penetrate the wood better. The different
types of wood treating plants, including pressure treating and thermal
non-pressure treating, use varying degrees of pressure, vacuum and
temperature.24
The pressure-treating
process involves placing the wood in a pressure-treating vessel
where it is immersed in the preservative and then subjected to applied
pressure. The excess penta is vacuumed from the vessel and the treated
wood is removed, inspected, stored, and shipped. In the non-pressure
process, which is used for short-term wood protection in construction
where the wood will be protected from exposure to soil or weather
through brick or cement barriers, penta is applied to the surface
of wood by spraying, brushing, dipping, and soaking. This process
is also used to control sapstain fungi by passing green lumber through
a spray tunnel or by dipping the wood.25
|
Tim
Skaggs died on October 17, 1991 at the age of 41 from acute
lymphoblastic leukemia. Tim worked for Simpson Lumber Company
at its Arcata mill starting at age 21. His initial employment
as a night shift laborer resulted in his working at various
jobs, including assignments to the paint line department where
he handled and sawed lumber treated with Woodlife, a penta
wood preservative manufactured and sold to Simpson by Champion.
Tim's exposure to this dangerous and defective chemical during
the period 1971 through late 1972 caused Tim's leukemia and
that of his co-workers at the Arcata mill. The diagnosis of
leukemia in Tim some 17 years after being exposed to this
known carcinogen was consistent with the latency period for
this type of chemically induced cancer. The California State
Department of Health's report of that investigation documented
three leukemias, including Timothy Skaggs, and one non-Hodgkins
lymphoma at the Arcata plant.
Richard Alexander, Dioxin in pentachlorophenol: A case study
of cancer deaths in the lumber industry, 1996, citing "Evaluation
of a Potential Cluster of Hematopoietic Cancers Among Workers
in a Wood Manufacturing Mill in California,"
California
Department of Health Services, Berkeley, April 12, 1990.
|
Toxic releases
from treatment sites
Wood preservative
treatment facilities have contributed greatly to the ranks of Superfund
cleanup sites. On the National Priority List (NPL) of sites identified
by EPA:
- Arsenic
has been found in at least 781 NPL sites;26
- Penta had
been found at least 314 NPL sites;27
- Chromium
has been found in at least 386 hazardous waste sites on the NPL;28
- Copper has
been found at least 210 NPL sites; and,29
- Creosote
has been found at least 38 of NPL sites.30
Maps:
Wood Preserving Plants (number per state)
and
National Priority List Sites
Contaminated with Penta, Creosote, Chromium or Arsenic
[Wood treatment sites and other sites]
Depending on the
process used by the treatment plant, wastes from plants include debris
from clean-out of pressure cylinders and sumps, filters and removed
from bag filters, sludge and wastewater, used personal protection
equipment such as respirator filters. In a survey conducted for a
Canadian government study, volumes of penta waste in treatment plants
using the chemical varied from 0.03 to 0.94 kg solid wastes/m3 (solid
wastes per cubic meter of) treated wood.31 The study assumes a 6%
concentration of penta in solid waste from treatment facilities.32
The study's analysis of the content of solid wastes from CCA treatment
facilities establishes a range of toxic material content: for arsenic
2.0 to 5.7%; chromium from 0.7 to 1.7%; and copper from 1.0 to 1.6%.33
Drip residues
is considered "one of the major potential sources of air-borne CCA
components in treatment plants."34 Penta treated wood, "particularly
immediately after treatment, emits PCP to the air and the wood may
exude excess preservative."35
Worker exposure
Exposure to
wood preservative chemicals is highest among workers at wood treatment
facilities.36 So much illness has resulted from worker exposure
to pentachlorophenol that it is seen as a significant source of
income for attorneys pursuing toxic torts.37 One study found that
mean pentachlorophenol levels in the blood of workers using penta
ranged from 83 to 57,600 parts per billion.38 Exposure to pentachlorophenol
at maximum air concentrations allowed by Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) are estimated to produce blood levels
one hundredth as high as the maximum found in this study.39 EPA
estimated the lifetime cancer risk of a worker in a wood treatment
plant using inorganic arsenicals as ranging from two in 100 to more
than one in ten. Cancer risk for workers using penta were based
on the dioxin contaminant, rather than all the ingredients. Nevertheless,
cancer risk was estimated to range from seven in 1,000 to more than
one in 100. EPA did not perform a quantitative risk assessment for
workers exposed to creosote.40
Back
to Chemical Production
| Contents | On
to Storage of Treated Poles
|
|