Getting the Alternatives You Need: The Beyond Pesticides Least Toxic Service Providers  Directory
What is IPM? Find A PCO Talking to Service Providers Beyond Pesticides Home Page PCO Directory
Pesticide Ingredients Pesticide Toxicity Non Toxic Pest Management Least Toxic Pesticides Toxic Pesticides

Toxic

Sulfur
Beyond Pesticides Rating: Toxic

An element of the earth's crust, sulfur dusts have been used as miticides/fungicides for centuries. Today, according the EPA, 135-190 million pounds are used annually in U.S. agriculture. Since sulfur is a naturally occurring material, and is relatively non-toxic to beneficials, organic and least-toxic gardeners have come to rely on it for the control of mites, mildew, scales, and rots.           

Sulfur is a non-metallic, insoluble element that makes up approximately 0.1% of U.S. soils. Sulfur is mined mostly in Texas, Louisiana, and Florida, but can also be recovered from petroleum distillation and from natural gas. There are over 200 registrations for formulations of sulfur pesticides, and at least five basic producers in this country. Sulfur's efficacy as a miticide/fungicide has been found to be dependent on particle size, with particles between 5-200 microns having the highest efficacy. Although traditionally used as a dust, flowable liquid formulations have been developed. 

Chronic human exposure to sulfur in mines and refineries has long been known to result in serious respiratory disturbances, including chronic bronchitis and sinus problems. Most agricultural incidents involve skin and eye irritations, but occasional systemic effects and deformities of the nails have also been reported. 

EPA's now defunct Pesticide Incident Monitoring System (PIMS) listed 241 poisoning incidents from 1976-1980. A third of those involved premature worker reentry into farm fields. The California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) reported 302 poisoning incidents in 1980-1981, of which 203 were field worker poisonings. In response, California established a 24-hour waiting period for reentry into treated fields.           

EPA reviewed the rather incomplete toxicological data-set on sulfur for a Registration Standard published in December, 1982. In this document, the Agency reviewed a sub-chronic inhalation study in rats, noting loss of body weight, and decreases in blood serum peroxidase, albumin, and sulfhydryl content.           

An undated, dermal exposure study in mice reported no carcinogenic effects, but the study was only one year long. EPA reviewers reported that sulfur was "probably" not mutagenic.           

EPA found sulfur to be of low toxicity to bees, aquatic organisms, birds, and fish. The Agency is not requiring submission of residue chemistry data, given sulfur's ubiquity in the environment, and has also waived environmental fate testing, including aquatic soil and water testing. Soil bacteria convert the insoluble element into the sulfate ion, which is water-soluble and can slowly leach into water. 

Resources:

"Chemical profile: Sulfur." Chemical Marketing Reporter. September 5, 1988. 

"Keeping close tabs on sulfur," Agrichemical Age. February 1987. 

Gosselin, R.E., et al. 1984. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD. 

Morgan, D.P. 1988. Recognition & Management of Pesticide Poisonings. 4th ed. U.S.-EPA. Washington, DC. 

U.S. EPA. 1983. Guidance for the reregistration of manufacturing use and certain end use pesticide products containing sulfur. Office of Pesticide Programs. Washington, DC. 

U.S. EPA. 1981. Pesticide incident monitoring system (PIMS) reports. Office of Pesticide Programs. Washington, DC. 

Reprinted from Pesticides and You Volume 8, Number 1, March 1988

 


BEYOND PESTICIDES
Freedom from Pesticides is Everybody's Right

For more information, email info@beyondpesticides.org