(Beyond Pesticides, February 7, 2014) Flying in the face ofÂ recent science demonstrating that pollinator populations are declining, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has made the decision to unconditionally register another pesticide that is known to be highly toxic to bees, coming almost one year after EPA registered sulfoxaflor, disregarding concerns from beekeepers and environmental groups. The announcement, posted in the Federal Register on Wednesday, set tolerances for the pesticide cyantraniliprole in foods ranging from almonds and berries, to leafy vegetables, onions, and milk. EPA establishes the allowable limit of the chemical residue, called tolerances, based on what EPA considers âacceptableâ risk.Â EPAâs ruling details that âthere is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide residue,â despite all evidence that cyantraniliprole is toxic to bees and harmful to mammals.
Ignoring beekeeper warning and concerns on their impacts to bees, EPA has given the green light for cyantraniliprole after recently registering sulfoxaflor. Â In July 2013, beekeepers filed suit against EPA for their decision to register sulfoxaflor when it failed to demonstrate that it will not cause any âunreasonable adverse effects on the environmentâ as required by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).Â Several comments were submitted by concerned beekeepers and environmental advocacy groups, like Beyond Pesticides, during the public comment period that stated that approval of a cyantriliprole, pesticide highly toxic to bees would only exacerbate the problems faced by an already tenuous honey bee industry and further decimate bee populations. However, instead of denying or suspending registration in the face of dire pollinator losses, EPA has chosen to register another insecticide that is toxic to bees, dismissing concerns regarding bee health in its response, and setting itself up for further litigation.
Cyantraniliprole is a systemic insecticide that works by impairing the regulation of muscle contractions causing paralysis and eventual death in insects. Beyond its impact to target pests âwhich include sucking and chewing insects such as whiteflies and thripsâ EPAâs most disturbing conclusions relate to the impact of cyantraniliprole on the livers of mammals: âWith repeated dosing, consistent findings of mild to moderate increases in liver weights across multiple species (rats, mice, and dogs) are observed. Dogs appear to be more sensitive than rats and miceâŚshow[ing] progressive severity with increased duration of exposure.â
EPA notes that cyantraniliprole also alters the stability of the thyroid as tested on laboratory rats as a result of enhanced metabolism of the thyroid hormones by the liver. Although the agency states that âcyantraniliprole is not a direct thyroid toxicant,â any indirect effects on thyroid function are likely to disrupt the endocrine system. Given that its current endocrine disruptor screening program (EDSP) is currently still in the process of validating tests, EPAâs registration of a new active ingredient that shows a propensity for endocrine disruption is cause for alarm.
In addition to these findings, EPA has registered cyantraniliprole as a seed treatment although it is considered âhighly toxic on acute and oral contact basisâ for bees. EPA is aware that pesticide-treated seeds directly threaten foraging bees and other non-target organisms, which are exposed to contaminated dust plumes during planting. Studies have documented high bee mortality following seed sowing and exposure to contaminated dust from agricultural fields. Moreover, EPA acknowledges the need to reduce fugitive toxic dust. However, with emerging science increasingly attributing pesticide exposures as one of the major causes of pollinator declines and the recent precautionary measuresÂ taken in the European Union to ban the use of pesticides known to impact bees, EPAâs registration of cyantraniliprole raises serious concerns.
Beekeepers nationwide have experienced honey bee losses of over 40 percent over the 2012/2013 winter period â2013/2014 winter losses are likely to be released soonâ with some beekeepers reporting losses of over 70 percent, far exceeding the normal rate of 10 to 15 percent. Some have even been driven out of business. Current estimates of the number of surviving hives in the U.S. show that these colonies may not be able to meet the future pollination demands of agricultural crops.
EPA’s approach to registration reinforces the urgent need for a national transition to organic. The takeaway for organic, as it grows beyond its current $35 billion market share, is the need for rigorousÂ science-based decision making that requires precaution on the allowance of chemical products in the face of hazards and scientific uncertainty. We must keep in mind the underlying standards of the organic rule, which requires that practices âmaintain or improve soil organic matter content in a manner that does not contribute to contamination of crops, soil, or water by plant nutrients, pathogenic organisms, heavy metals, or residues of prohibited substances.â
For the most recent action being taken to protect honey bees, see the Beyond Pesticides BEE ProtectiveÂ campaign which works with national and local groups to protect honey bees and other pollinators from pesticides and contaminated landscapes.
Join us April 11-12 for Beyond Pesticidesâ 32nd National Pesticide Forum, in Portland, OR on âAdvancing Sustainable Communities: People, pollinators, and practicesâ which will focus on solutions to the decline of pollinators and other beneficials; strengthening organic agriculture; improving farmworker protection and agricultural justice; and creating healthy buildings, schools and homes. Space is limited so register now.
All unattributed positions and opinions in this piece are those of Beyond Pesticides.
Source: Federal Register