<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atrazine Manufacturer To Pay $105 Million to Community Water Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=7464</link>
	<description>News on pesticide science, policy and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Shistar</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=7464#comment-146752</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Shistar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 17:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=7464#comment-146752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can $105 million possibly be enough to repay the 1887 to 2000 CWSs that have experienced atrazine contamination? Divide that out, and it amounts to $55+K per CWS. And the costs to the CWS do not necessarily depend on &quot;its historical atrazine contamination levels and volume of water filtered.&quot; The installation of the carbon filtration system is a capital expenditure that is the same regardless of the actual atrazine levels. This settlement seems totally inadequate, even with its limited scope.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can $105 million possibly be enough to repay the 1887 to 2000 CWSs that have experienced atrazine contamination? Divide that out, and it amounts to $55+K per CWS. And the costs to the CWS do not necessarily depend on &#8220;its historical atrazine contamination levels and volume of water filtered.&#8221; The installation of the carbon filtration system is a capital expenditure that is the same regardless of the actual atrazine levels. This settlement seems totally inadequate, even with its limited scope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
