<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cosmetic Use of Lawn Chemicals Banned in Ontario</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=333</link>
	<description>News on pesticide science, policy and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan H.</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=333#comment-84941</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=333#comment-84941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My twelve year old shih-tzu was euthanized last week. She had been diagnosed with a rare form of lymphoma several months prior. At the time that she passed her little body was covered with tumors and lesions. I feel strongly that exposure to lawn chemicals were the culprit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My twelve year old shih-tzu was euthanized last week. She had been diagnosed with a rare form of lymphoma several months prior. At the time that she passed her little body was covered with tumors and lesions. I feel strongly that exposure to lawn chemicals were the culprit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k williams</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=333#comment-83273</link>
		<dc:creator>k williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 11:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=333#comment-83273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If it&#039;s not toxic then why is it labeled POISON? I am continuously &quot;amused&quot; by those thinking that something labeled poison isn&#039;t really poisonous... and in order to not be legally exposed, those who object to first hand poisoning must prove they aren&#039;t poisonous...yeah that makes sense.

So I guess the real question is??? why do governments continue to expose all of us to poisons for weed control, knowing full well they are toxic and have caused problems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s not toxic then why is it labeled POISON? I am continuously &#8220;amused&#8221; by those thinking that something labeled poison isn&#8217;t really poisonous&#8230; and in order to not be legally exposed, those who object to first hand poisoning must prove they aren&#8217;t poisonous&#8230;yeah that makes sense.</p>
<p>So I guess the real question is??? why do governments continue to expose all of us to poisons for weed control, knowing full well they are toxic and have caused problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=333#comment-83123</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=333#comment-83123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All around the world studies proves that then dicamba is not toxic for cosmetic uses.  Canada (like Quebec and Ontario) just banned this product to be politically correct... the image is vrey important...  In Quebec province, personnal use (5%) is banned and commercial use (95%) is allowed ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All around the world studies proves that then dicamba is not toxic for cosmetic uses.  Canada (like Quebec and Ontario) just banned this product to be politically correct&#8230; the image is vrey important&#8230;  In Quebec province, personnal use (5%) is banned and commercial use (95%) is allowed ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Golf Clubs Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=333#comment-68469</link>
		<dc:creator>Golf Clubs Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=333#comment-68469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada is actually really smart...they look out for their people in their country...which is something America needs to work more on, seems to be USA is more worried about whats going on in other countries rather than its own.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada is actually really smart&#8230;they look out for their people in their country&#8230;which is something America needs to work more on, seems to be USA is more worried about whats going on in other countries rather than its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dog looks for safe lawn</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=333#comment-58888</link>
		<dc:creator>dog looks for safe lawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=333#comment-58888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States is far too complacent in this area. Canada has taken the lead and has decided to do the right thing and protect its people. The US is sitting back and waiting for a statistically significant number of people to fall victim to the ill effects of common yard pesticides - I say why wait? if they are suspected or known carcinogens and the inert ingredients are toxic as well ...why are they permitted to be sold and used by an unsuspecting public. Wake up America!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States is far too complacent in this area. Canada has taken the lead and has decided to do the right thing and protect its people. The US is sitting back and waiting for a statistically significant number of people to fall victim to the ill effects of common yard pesticides &#8211; I say why wait? if they are suspected or known carcinogens and the inert ingredients are toxic as well &#8230;why are they permitted to be sold and used by an unsuspecting public. Wake up America!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dog looks for safe lawn</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=333#comment-58884</link>
		<dc:creator>dog looks for safe lawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=333#comment-58884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This combination of yard chemicals is used everywhere and no one seems to care. I learned that other dogs that I know in North Carolina in retirement communities are down right sick and getting sicker by the year being exposed to all this stuff. They also complain of being itchy and having a runny noes and that they arent feeling well - might there be a connection between a real fixef life span of many breeds of dogs and the use of these poisons that rub up close to my belly every time I take a squirt?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This combination of yard chemicals is used everywhere and no one seems to care. I learned that other dogs that I know in North Carolina in retirement communities are down right sick and getting sicker by the year being exposed to all this stuff. They also complain of being itchy and having a runny noes and that they arent feeling well &#8211; might there be a connection between a real fixef life span of many breeds of dogs and the use of these poisons that rub up close to my belly every time I take a squirt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
