<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal Legislation Introduced to Protect Children from Toxic Pesticide Use at Schools; New Study Documents State Progress in the Adoption of Safer School Pest Management Policies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761</link>
	<description>News on pesticide science, policy and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-87001</link>
		<dc:creator>m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-87001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I meant to say how many can attribute their illnesses to pyrethroid exposure, a KNOWN sensitizer!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say how many can attribute their illnesses to pyrethroid exposure, a KNOWN sensitizer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-87000</link>
		<dc:creator>m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-87000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This cavalier attitude is typical of what I have encountered when trying to get help after my child was repeatedly poisoned by ornamental pesticides:

http://insectsinthecity.blogspot.com/

WAKE UP, all the &quot;registered pesticides,&quot; and herbicides for that matter are unsafe for children! How any ill people out there can attribute being &quot;sensitized&quot; by pyrethroid exposure!

Children should able to learn in a safe environment and we as parents need to demand that! 

We should not tolerate being scoffed at and put off by &quot;professionals&quot; who perpetuate the myth that these products are safe!

The suffering and damage caused by this stuff to pets and children across the country has been happening for years and as a health professional, and mother I can&#039;t just sit by silently!

I have  a little ten year old who deserves better  than this and who has suffered needlessly! A child that I worry about each minute he is away from his controlled environment, in the fear that some shallow minded person who actually believes the stuff is safe might spray it around him! I have spent more than one time in an ER wondering how many more  of my son&#039;s brain cells are being killed1

So excuse me for not sitting idly by while someone who has no care or clue as to the impact of this poison on children can make fun of the  efforts of others to try safer pest control! I think not!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This cavalier attitude is typical of what I have encountered when trying to get help after my child was repeatedly poisoned by ornamental pesticides:</p>
<p><a href="http://insectsinthecity.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://insectsinthecity.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>WAKE UP, all the &#8220;registered pesticides,&#8221; and herbicides for that matter are unsafe for children! How any ill people out there can attribute being &#8220;sensitized&#8221; by pyrethroid exposure!</p>
<p>Children should able to learn in a safe environment and we as parents need to demand that! </p>
<p>We should not tolerate being scoffed at and put off by &#8220;professionals&#8221; who perpetuate the myth that these products are safe!</p>
<p>The suffering and damage caused by this stuff to pets and children across the country has been happening for years and as a health professional, and mother I can&#8217;t just sit by silently!</p>
<p>I have  a little ten year old who deserves better  than this and who has suffered needlessly! A child that I worry about each minute he is away from his controlled environment, in the fear that some shallow minded person who actually believes the stuff is safe might spray it around him! I have spent more than one time in an ER wondering how many more  of my son&#8217;s brain cells are being killed1</p>
<p>So excuse me for not sitting idly by while someone who has no care or clue as to the impact of this poison on children can make fun of the  efforts of others to try safer pest control! I think not!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-86999</link>
		<dc:creator>m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-86999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are they putting &quot;ant granules&quot; around your school in the 1st place!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are they putting &#8220;ant granules&#8221; around your school in the 1st place!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlote Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-86917</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlote Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-86917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The school IPM law is not protecting the majority of children and teachers in Texas.  Mr. Merchant says 200 out of 1,032 school districts voluntarily practice safer pest management and that simply is NOT good enough.  He says IPM is working in Texas and I disagree.  When we tried to locate the IPM Coordinator in Houston ISD, the largest district in our state, he/she was nowhere to be found. This was after a Pre-K teacher found ant killer in what they intended to be an organic vegetable garden. A contracted company applied granules without consulting the teacher. If the IPM coordinator is the foundation on which Texas school IPM program is based then the school district should be able to locate the coordinator in one phone call. 

Many thanks to Beyond Pesticides for your perseverance and continuing to submit this very important legislation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The school IPM law is not protecting the majority of children and teachers in Texas.  Mr. Merchant says 200 out of 1,032 school districts voluntarily practice safer pest management and that simply is NOT good enough.  He says IPM is working in Texas and I disagree.  When we tried to locate the IPM Coordinator in Houston ISD, the largest district in our state, he/she was nowhere to be found. This was after a Pre-K teacher found ant killer in what they intended to be an organic vegetable garden. A contracted company applied granules without consulting the teacher. If the IPM coordinator is the foundation on which Texas school IPM program is based then the school district should be able to locate the coordinator in one phone call. </p>
<p>Many thanks to Beyond Pesticides for your perseverance and continuing to submit this very important legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beyond Pesticides</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-86603</link>
		<dc:creator>Beyond Pesticides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-86603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is what we hear everyday. Parents do not want their children exposed to chemicals that cause cancer, asthma, neurotoxic and immune system effects, endocrine disruption, developmental disabilities and more . . .especially when they are not necessary. And it is not just Beyond Pesticides that is hearing it. Towns and cities across the country, schools, hospitals and homeowners want the same thing. The great thing is that it is possible today to manage buildings and grounds without pesticides that cause these effects.

The School Environment Protection Act is based on practitioners’ experience managing buildings and grounds without the hazardous pesticides that Mr. Merchant says are necessary. While Mr. Merchant focuses on the pesticide products, these managers are focused on the systems in place that exclude unwanted organisms from their site, by managing sanitation, harborage, entryways and conducive conditions that enable pest problems. Yes, sometimes a pesticide product will be necessary. The question is which ones. Here is where SEPA utilizes modern approaches, green chemistry on the cutting edge of technology that has made the chemicals that Mr. Merchant doesn’t want to lose obsolete. He refers to this new modern technology as “the most primitive products with limited usefulness.” I think if you ask the companies that are out in the marketplace selling services to parents and other customers that are looking for “green” services, they will tell you that they have all kinds of modern tools in the tool box, from mechanical, biological, to chemical products derived from natural substances that meet the standards of SEPA and work just fine when they are needed. But, the great thing, is that these same folks will tell you that if an IPM program is operating effectively with all the systems in place, they simply do not need to use much pesticide product at all.

IPM is an evolving methodology. Years ago IPM practitioners did not differentiate among all the pesticides available in the marketplace. They were highly dependent on very hazardous materials, except they only used them when their monitoring told them it was necessary. So, in most cases, even the most chemical-dependent IPM system was still dependent on chemical products. Today’s IPM system that are a part of the “green” movement and not stuck on pesticide-dependency put much more emphasis on practices and management and only use selected products as a last resort. As a result, many are finding that pesticide products become the exception rather than the rule and when they use them, as a last resort, they rely on “green” products that meet the health and environmental screen in SEPA.

We told three decades ago by many at that time in extension, many like Mr. Merchant, or as he says, “most professionals working to implement safer and better pest control,” that organic was impossible to commercialize, that it was unrealistic, that it “takes away the best pest management tools,” and now it is over a $20 billion industry with increasing support from extension and practitioners worldwide.

SEPA is cutting edge legislation that embraces the experiences across the country where schools and communities have rejected the old arguments of Mr. Merchant and are meeting the challenges of land and building management with new and creative approaches that manage pests and protect the health and environment at the same time. Don’t believe those who tell us that we cannot survive without hazardous pesticides.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what we hear everyday. Parents do not want their children exposed to chemicals that cause cancer, asthma, neurotoxic and immune system effects, endocrine disruption, developmental disabilities and more . . .especially when they are not necessary. And it is not just Beyond Pesticides that is hearing it. Towns and cities across the country, schools, hospitals and homeowners want the same thing. The great thing is that it is possible today to manage buildings and grounds without pesticides that cause these effects.</p>
<p>The School Environment Protection Act is based on practitioners’ experience managing buildings and grounds without the hazardous pesticides that Mr. Merchant says are necessary. While Mr. Merchant focuses on the pesticide products, these managers are focused on the systems in place that exclude unwanted organisms from their site, by managing sanitation, harborage, entryways and conducive conditions that enable pest problems. Yes, sometimes a pesticide product will be necessary. The question is which ones. Here is where SEPA utilizes modern approaches, green chemistry on the cutting edge of technology that has made the chemicals that Mr. Merchant doesn’t want to lose obsolete. He refers to this new modern technology as “the most primitive products with limited usefulness.” I think if you ask the companies that are out in the marketplace selling services to parents and other customers that are looking for “green” services, they will tell you that they have all kinds of modern tools in the tool box, from mechanical, biological, to chemical products derived from natural substances that meet the standards of SEPA and work just fine when they are needed. But, the great thing, is that these same folks will tell you that if an IPM program is operating effectively with all the systems in place, they simply do not need to use much pesticide product at all.</p>
<p>IPM is an evolving methodology. Years ago IPM practitioners did not differentiate among all the pesticides available in the marketplace. They were highly dependent on very hazardous materials, except they only used them when their monitoring told them it was necessary. So, in most cases, even the most chemical-dependent IPM system was still dependent on chemical products. Today’s IPM system that are a part of the “green” movement and not stuck on pesticide-dependency put much more emphasis on practices and management and only use selected products as a last resort. As a result, many are finding that pesticide products become the exception rather than the rule and when they use them, as a last resort, they rely on “green” products that meet the health and environmental screen in SEPA.</p>
<p>We told three decades ago by many at that time in extension, many like Mr. Merchant, or as he says, “most professionals working to implement safer and better pest control,” that organic was impossible to commercialize, that it was unrealistic, that it “takes away the best pest management tools,” and now it is over a $20 billion industry with increasing support from extension and practitioners worldwide.</p>
<p>SEPA is cutting edge legislation that embraces the experiences across the country where schools and communities have rejected the old arguments of Mr. Merchant and are meeting the challenges of land and building management with new and creative approaches that manage pests and protect the health and environment at the same time. Don’t believe those who tell us that we cannot survive without hazardous pesticides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Merchant</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-86547</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Merchant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-86547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doing IPM in schools is the right thing to do.  But this current legislation is not supported by most professionals working to implement safer and better pest control for school districts.  For one thing, it will pre-empt even the most comprehensive school IPM programs in the country--laws that have been painstakingly developed over years in coordination with regulators, schools, IPM experts and the public.  The bill would in practice eliminate nearly all pesticides, except the most primitive products with limited usefulness, for any purpose except public health emergencies.  A good thing you say? This would leave schools with few alternatives for termite control, nuisance pest control and turfgrass management.  Telling schools that they must do IPM and like it, while at the same time taking away all the best pest management tools in their tool boxes will not make IPM successful.  Indeed this approach runs counter to the IPM concept which emphasizes use of multiple control tactics.  In Texas we&#039;ve chosen a route that does not ban any pesticide that might be needed, but provides incentives to use fewer and lower toxicity insecticides.  The result, after 15 years of implementation, is enthusiasm among schools to jump on the IPM bandwagon, use of fewer and safer pesticides, and better pest control.  Indeed, over 200 Texas school IPM coordinators met last month to form their own voluntary association dedicated to keeping schools safer, cleaner and pest-free.  This is tremendous progress when I recall the low-priority, chemically intensive approach to pest control most Texas schools took just a few years ago.  Instead of resubmitting the same impractical, unpopular and expensive bill year after year and watching it die in committee, Beyond Pesticides, Rep. Holt and others should consult with states and figure out a way to provide us with a simple bill that requires licensing of all school pesticide users (a very basic requirement still needed in many states) and mandates states to develop their own incentives-based IPM programs--which they can design.  If there is ever going to be progress in this area, this is the way to go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doing IPM in schools is the right thing to do.  But this current legislation is not supported by most professionals working to implement safer and better pest control for school districts.  For one thing, it will pre-empt even the most comprehensive school IPM programs in the country&#8211;laws that have been painstakingly developed over years in coordination with regulators, schools, IPM experts and the public.  The bill would in practice eliminate nearly all pesticides, except the most primitive products with limited usefulness, for any purpose except public health emergencies.  A good thing you say? This would leave schools with few alternatives for termite control, nuisance pest control and turfgrass management.  Telling schools that they must do IPM and like it, while at the same time taking away all the best pest management tools in their tool boxes will not make IPM successful.  Indeed this approach runs counter to the IPM concept which emphasizes use of multiple control tactics.  In Texas we&#8217;ve chosen a route that does not ban any pesticide that might be needed, but provides incentives to use fewer and lower toxicity insecticides.  The result, after 15 years of implementation, is enthusiasm among schools to jump on the IPM bandwagon, use of fewer and safer pesticides, and better pest control.  Indeed, over 200 Texas school IPM coordinators met last month to form their own voluntary association dedicated to keeping schools safer, cleaner and pest-free.  This is tremendous progress when I recall the low-priority, chemically intensive approach to pest control most Texas schools took just a few years ago.  Instead of resubmitting the same impractical, unpopular and expensive bill year after year and watching it die in committee, Beyond Pesticides, Rep. Holt and others should consult with states and figure out a way to provide us with a simple bill that requires licensing of all school pesticide users (a very basic requirement still needed in many states) and mandates states to develop their own incentives-based IPM programs&#8211;which they can design.  If there is ever going to be progress in this area, this is the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beyond Pesticides</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-86546</link>
		<dc:creator>Beyond Pesticides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-86546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sonya, thanks for your support! You can simply send an email with your information/name of your group to kowens@beyondpesticides.org.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonya, thanks for your support! You can simply send an email with your information/name of your group to <a href="mailto:kowens@beyondpesticides.org">kowens@beyondpesticides.org</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonya</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-86535</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=2761#comment-86535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am wondering how a group or individual can &quot;sign on&quot; or register support for this important legislation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering how a group or individual can &#8220;sign on&#8221; or register support for this important legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
