<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Zealand Joins Others in Banning Endosulfan, U.S. Use Continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=1032</link>
	<description>News on pesticide science, policy and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:36:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Satyabroto Banerji</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=1032#comment-77962</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Satyabroto Banerji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=1032#comment-77962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Endosulfan can and should be used safely and judiciously. Each active ingredient has its own advantages and drawbacks. I feel that we should view both sides. Endosulfan is economical. It has a broad spectrum of activity. It has an engaging profile for pollinators, egg parasites and predators. It is a generic product. Off-target residues can be re-mediated chemically or through microbes. I have worked with it for decades, albeit with competitive interests for most of the time. Endosulfan bans are propagated by corporations that wish to promote neo-nicotinoids. Let us not become pawns in internecine battles between patent holders and generic producers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Endosulfan can and should be used safely and judiciously. Each active ingredient has its own advantages and drawbacks. I feel that we should view both sides. Endosulfan is economical. It has a broad spectrum of activity. It has an engaging profile for pollinators, egg parasites and predators. It is a generic product. Off-target residues can be re-mediated chemically or through microbes. I have worked with it for decades, albeit with competitive interests for most of the time. Endosulfan bans are propagated by corporations that wish to promote neo-nicotinoids. Let us not become pawns in internecine battles between patent holders and generic producers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
